Over the past 15 years, small holder farmers in the Mkushi district in North-Central Zambia have enjoyed steady rises in maize yields. Jeremy Haggar, SAIRLA’s technical lead reports back on a visit to the area with research partner AFRINT IV to understand how. 20180716 164308

Mkushi district has been called the bread-basket of the country. The district sits on the divide between large-scale commercial farms established during colonial times, and traditional smallholder farming communities. The AFRINT IV – Policy for Equity in African Agriculture – project led by Lund University has been monitoring smallholder farmers in five villages in the District since 2002. One of the main findings is that maize yields have increased by 80 per cent over the past 15 years, showing a steady rise across that time. Although yields for women headed households were 17-18 per cent lower than for male headed households, they also experienced similar yield increases.

To understand what has contributed to increased productivity and how women have also participated the AFRINT partner at the University of Zambia, organized for SAIRLA to meet with a range of stakeholders from the District Agricultural Office (DAO), farming communities, women and youth groups, agricultural input suppliers and the Chief for the area. We learnt that the main support for agriculture, and in particular maize, comes from the government through the Farmer Input Support Programme and the Food Reserve Agency as a purchaser of maize, and government extension services supplemented by donor funded technical support through the Conservation Farming Unit. According to a DAO extensionist, roughly half the farmers in the District, about 17,000 in total, had access to subsidised inputs the previous year.

Despite this apparent progress  farmers are facing two major challenges. The Chief of one of the villages told us that the previous maize harvest had been poor; he estimated in some cases a quarter the production of previous years. This was due to poor rains at the start of the growing season leading to poor crop establishment. There was interest amongst farmers to diversify crops, perhaps returning to crops that were previously more common, such as cassava and sorghum, which are more climate change resilient. It appeared that one of the reasons for the growth in maize production was the government technical and input support focussed on maize. The other major challenge for farmers was access to markets. Farmers were dependent on buyers from or linked to the capital to purchase their products with limited processing of crops within the district.

Accessing government support

For farmers to apply for input subsidies they have to be members of a cooperative, women’s club or youth club. Applications are collated and reviewed by what is called the Camp Agricultural Committee (CAC). In one community the committee consisted of 10 community representatives from different zones plus representatives of the Chief, district government, school and local NGOs. The CAC reviewed applications from 46 co-ops, 24 women’s clubs and one youth club representing 2046 farmers. In the past the CAC would receive the subsidised fertiliser and distribute to the coops and clubs who in turn would distribute to the farmers. The previous year the system changed to farmers applying through their coops and clubs to receive individual e-vouchers. Farmers have to contribute 400 Kwacha in funds, while the government contributes 1700 Kwacha. The e-voucher acts as a pre-paid card which farmers  can take  to  suppliers to buy whatever kind of inputs they like. From our interviews in two communities and with agro-dealers it appears farmers have been taking advantage of this flexibility to purchase not only fertiliser, and maize and legume seed but also herbicide, pesticides, vegetable seed, implements and even chicks. This should allow farmers to tailor their investments to their own particular needs and interests, and it not limited to supporting maize production as subsidies were in the past. At the same time the prepayment of 400 Kwacha limits access by some – especially women who head their own households - and it is said some farmers sell off the inputs upon receiving them.

The role of conservation agriculture (CA) in increasing agricultural productivity

In one community there was a lead farmer who promoted CA through establishing demonstration plots and using them to discuss the practices with other farmers. Conservation agriculture as practiced here focusses on two alternative soil preparation methods either use of a ox-drawn ripper that opens a single furrow into which the seeds are planted, or hand made basins that concentrate water into a smaller area where the crop seeds are planted. These practices are promoted as an alternative to ploughing, and are considered to better conserve the soil and particularly soil moisture, which should be important in drought years. Amongst the farmers who practice CA some considered the practice improved yields, while others thought only in some years. Most farmers spoken to only practiced CA on a part of their land. From further discussion it appeared that access to oxen was a challenge. An important  incentive for ripping was that thrice the area can be ripped as ploughed in one day. While, making hand-made basins was a lot of work and could only be done on a small area. Nevertheless, the main challenge of CA cited by the farmers was that weed growth was quicker after sowing, either resulting in more work hand weeding, or the need to apply herbicide. Several farmers mentioned purchasing herbicide either with their own funds, or with the e-voucher that could be used for any inputs. Indeed, one agro-dealer said he sold seven thousand litres of herbicide to farmers using the e-voucher. Thus, the flexibility of what inputs can be purchased with the e-voucher may enable farmers to purchase inputs needed for CA.

For the farmers of Mkushi to thrive, their capacity  to respond to changing climate and markets needs strengthening. The e-voucher allowing farmers to select those inputs which respond to their interests and needs may support this. Technical support should also enable farmers to assess the trade-offs between different cropping practices to conserve their soils, crops that are resilient to climate change and products to meet market demand. 

Media participant and active member of the SAIRLA Ghana National Learning Alliance, Ama Amankwaa Baafi has been adjudged the Best Agricultural Reporter (print) for 2017 by the Ghana Journalist Association (GJA).  Ama was among 36 journalists who were recognized for their outstanding work and contribution to national development during the 23rd edition of the GJA awards that took place on Saturday, 27th October 2018 at the Kempinsky Hotel in Accra.  Ama Amankwaa Baafi receives her GJA award

Ama’s story titled “Lack of Research Blamed for Fall Armyworm Invasion” that won her the award sought to draw the attention of government and high level decision makers to the fact that agricultural research has not been given the needed attention and that has resulted in the devastation the Fall Armyworm (FAW) incidence has caused to the nation’s agriculture.

Sharing the news with colleague members on the SAIRLA Ghana NLA platform, Ama indicated that she got most of her story ideas from her participation in SAIRLA Ghana NLA activities and other CABI engagements. Through these, she got well enlightened on current agricultural issues including the FAW. She therefore expressed deep appreciation for the opportunity to be part of these projects that have contributed immensely to her award winning feat.

Ama has been a very active member of the Ghana National Learning Alliance under the DFID-funded Sustainable Agricultural Intensification Research and Learning in Africa (SAIRLA) programme which was launched in February 2017. She has attended and participated in almost all the NLA’s programmes and activities including social learning engagements and dialogues on topical sustainable agricultural intensification issues including the FAW incidence and pesticides use, alternate protein feed sources for livestock, and gender and climate-responsive investments.  From her participation in these programmes, Ama has published several articles related to the above-named Ghana NLA social learning themes in Ghana’s leading newspaper, the Daily Graphic and on their online portal, graphic business online.   

Another media participant of the SAIRLA Ghana NLA, Christian Akorlie also won an award in another category: Best Reporter – Small and Medium Scale Enterprises.

SAIRLA Ghana NLA wishes to congratulate our two members for their hard work and distinguished contribution to Ghana’s agricultural and development efforts that have won them these prestigious awards 

Women need first-hand information and knowledge about new agricultural technologies to have a say on how family farms are run. Understanding that families are a unit of production directs how the SAIRLA-funded GALA project supports small-scale farming households to achieve sustainable legume intensification. The project team recognise the gender issues involved and the constraints women may face in adopting a family-centric learning approach. The first step is to improve their access to information and knowledge on farming techniques.

Research by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation highlighted the importance of including women in agricultural decision-making. It estimated that if women were given the same access to productive resources as men, farm yields could increase by 20-30 per cent, potentially reducing world hunger by 12-17 per cent.  Gala cinema QA
Although information is not the only barrier to participation, research by ASHC/GALA and others have shown that women source information on agricultural technologies in fewer ways than men and often rely on informal sources and other members of the household.  One of the key ways in which the project is getting the word out there is through village-based film screenings. In 2017, three tricycles carrying projectors, screens and generators visited almost 100 communities.
The 45 minute film informs those watching of the latest technologies and techniques in legume cultivation to increase yields and incomes. The screenings are lively events with question and answer session going on for a further 60-90 minutes. An estimated 29,555 people attended these screenings. Of those attending, roughly 30 per cent were women, 20 per cent were men and the balance were school aged children.
A Q&A with Dannie Romney, Global Director, Development, Communication and Extension, CABI  explores these attendance figures and their potential for significantly affecting women’s participation in agricultural decision-making:
Q. Why were the screenings so successful at attracting women?
A. Before the screenings community animateurs from our partners Countrywise Communications Ghana went into the villages, spoke to the elders to understand how the village worked. The elders explained when people ate and when the last prayers were held at the mosque. These cultural differences were taken into account when deciding the best time to show the films. Importantly, there were no child care issues because the women could bring their children to the screening. Because the children kept silent during the film we were pretty sure the content was useful to the women. If they don’t value the content of the films they don’t bother keeping the children quiet. We were told that the films about hand washing were quite noisy affairs!. This is one of the best options we have found for family based learning that encourages information sharing without disadvantaging women’s attendance. We have never consistently had more women attending demo plots, extension meetings or actively participating in the radio campaigns.  
Q. What makes this format of learning ‘family-centric’?
A.This approach is allowing women access to information alongside men and children which we hope will change the dynamic of discussion and potentially decision-making within the home. We don’t know if it’s working yet as the project doesn’t finish until next year but that is what we are very keen to explore. We have seen this happen in other parts of our commincations work where we used Shujaaz comics to empower young people with information.
Q.Why was this approach more effective than others?
A. This isn’t a culture where a lot of things are written down, so everything learned needs to be remembered. Through the screenings we expect the quality of information adopted to be improved by sharing the responsibility for remembering. People don’t talk about the quality of adoption enough. If thousands of people are trying to uptake a technology but they’re not doing it right because they forgot some key bit of information, they won’t see the benefits and they won’t do it again. We want to see high quality of adoption to give us good results which people will copy.
Q. How does this change women’s role in agricultural decision making at the domestic level?
A. Family centric learning starts with conversations with farming families about what they need to know. We then think of the farming family as the unit of production and present information where men and women’s roles are given equal credence. There may still be some challenges around traditional gender roles but the film provides the whole family with the information it needs. Therefore women are not disadvantaged by getting all their information second-hand. We’re hoping to change the conversations women are able to have within the household to take greater ownership over the decisions made and how the farm budget is allocated. The films are attempting to contribute to the families memory bank on how these technologies work. The final refinement we want to make is to break down how we present the information on the technology as step wise advice. By this we mean advice which is set out to ensure that we recognise packages of the technology that will have a good return on investment. Too often research findings are presented as a complete, but unaffordable, package. If we can help all farmers work out effective investment strategies for small investments in fertilizer and seed, we can slowly close the production gap and lift families out of poverty and into food security.
The 2018 soybean planting season starts in July. Ahead of the season an integrated campaign will be delivered by a network of partners  encompassing farmer field schools, demo plots, radio spots and discussions and village-based film screenings in Northern, Upper East and Upper West regions.
Dannie Romney is currently Project Executive for the Africa Soil Health Consortium (ASHC) and Gender and the Legume Alliance (GALA) projects working jointly in Ghana. This blog is reproduced with kind permission.
Read the blog from Jeremy Haggar, SAIRLA's Research Director on his experience of GALA's village-based film screenings.
Image: iStock

The global demand for food is set to increase significantly.  With smallholder farms in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) representing 80 per cent of all farms in the region, and contributing up to 90 per cent of food production in some countries, smallholder agriculture is seen as an effective means of reducing poverty and hunger in low-income countries - but only through sustainable access to markets. 

This new Working Paper from SAIRLA introduces the different perspectives on Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (SAI), the possible pathways leading towards increases in agricultural productivity as well as the trade-offs that exist between the overall approaches and between elements of them. The paper aims to inform SSA stakeholders as they contextualise SAI in diverse national and local contexts and in the wider global context. In turn, SSA stakeholders will seek to inform and engage decision-makers to as to what constitutes an effective enabling environment that will enable poor African smallholder farmers, especially women and youth, to benefit from SAI and agricultural development in SSA.    

Download Understanding different perspectives on Sustainable Agricultural Intensification and how it can be achieved, SAIRLA Working Paper 1.


Funded by:
Managed by: